4.5 Article

Increased CSF-BACE1 Activity Associated with Decreased Hippocampus Volume in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 373-381

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2011-091153

关键词

BACE1; beta-secretase; cerebrospinal fluid; hippocampus

资金

  1. Federal Agency of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) [01 GI 0102]
  2. Adelaide and Meath Hospital incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH)
  3. Health Service Executive (HSE)
  4. Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
  5. Science Foundation Ireland [08/IN.1/B1846]
  6. National Institute on Aging [NIHRO1AG025888]
  7. Alzheimer's Association
  8. Arizona Alzheimer Research Consortium
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG025888] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enzyme beta-secretase (BACE1) is essentially involved in the production of cerebral amyloidogenic pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The measurement of BACE1 activity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been reported, which may render CSF measurement of BACE1 a potential biomarker candidate of AD. In order to investigate whether BACE1 protein activity is correlated with regional brain atrophy in AD, we investigated the association between CSF levels of BACE1 and MRI-assessed hippocampus volume in patients with AD (n = 30). An increase in CSF-BACE1 activity was associated with decreased left and right hippocampus volume corrected for global head volume in the AD patients. Boot-strapped regression analysis showed that increased CSF levels of BACE1 activity were associated with increased CSF concentration of total tau but not amyloid-beta(1-42) in AD. White matter hyperintensities did not influence the results. BACE1 activity and protein levels were significantly increased in AD compared to 19 elderly healthy controls. Thus, the CSF biomarker candidate of BACE1 activity was associated with hippocampus atrophy in AD in a robust manner and may reflect neurotoxic amyloid-beta-related processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据