4.5 Article

Correlation between Cognitive Impairment and CSF Biomarkers in Amnesic MCI, non-Amnesic MCI, and Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 971-980

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101203

关键词

A beta(1-42); Alzheimer's disease; cognitive speed; MCI; memory; total tau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decreased delayed recall, decreased amyloid-beta peptides (A beta(1-42)), and increased tau protein concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are generally regarded to be valid neuropsychological and biological markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous studies failed to demonstrate clear-cut correlations between neuropsychological impairment and CSF markers. In this study we test recent models of disease progression, that propose that changes in CSF biomarkers already reach a plateau in a preclinical phase, before cognitive decline begins, that is, even before MCI can be diagnosed. We recruited 73 patients with probable AD (n = 36) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (amnesic MCI = 25; non-amnesic MCI = 12). We used the CERAD-NP, a widely used neuropsychological battery with norms for different age and education groups, and additional neuropsychological tests for assessing the cognitive profile of these patient groups. We found a significant correlation between A beta(1-42) in the CSF and memory performance for amnesic MCI patients, but not for non-amnesic MCI and AD patients. All other correlations between cognitive tasks and A beta(1-42) were not significant. Tau protein concentration in the CSF was not correlated with any neuropsychological marker in any of the patients groups. We conclude that the decrease of A beta(1-42) in the CSF mirrors disease progression during the early stages up into AD and therefore is not restricted to the preclinical phase. The decrease of A beta(1-42) reaches a plateau only in the full blown demented syndrome and further functional disease progression is then related to neurodegeneration without further reduction of A beta(1-42) in the CSF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据