4.5 Article

Cholinesterase Activity and mRNA Level of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors (alpha 4 and beta 2 Subunits) in Blood of Elderly Chinese Diagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 849-858

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1283

关键词

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; acetylcholinesterase; Alzheimer's disease; butyrylcholinesterase

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [30870986]
  2. Foundation in the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006DFA33530]
  3. Foundation in Guizhou of China [J20072092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study is to investigate the cholinergic deficit in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and identify candidate blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of the disease. Twenty-nine elderly Chinese diagnosed with AD and 33 age-matched controls were selected. The activities of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) in plasma were detected by a spectrophotometric method, and the mRNA levels of alpha 4 and beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits in blood leukocytes were analyzed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The results showed that AChE activity in plasma was significantly lower in the AD group than in normal controls, while BuChE activity did not show any differences between AD and controls; mRNA levels of both alpha 4 and beta 2 nAChR subunits in blood leukocytes were significantly lower in the AD group than in controls. The AChE activity and the mRNA levels of alpha 4 and beta 2 nAChR subunits in the AD patients were also significantly correlated with cognitive test scores. No differences of AChE in plasma or alpha 4 and beta 2 nAChR subunits in blood leukocytes were detected between smoking and non-smoking subjects. The results indicated that the decreases in the activity of AChE and in the mRNA levels of nAChR alpha 4 and beta 2 subunits from the peripheral blood of patients with AD might serve as supplementary indicators for the clinical diagnosis of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据