4.5 Article

Complexes of Amyloid-beta and Cystatin C in the Human Central Nervous System

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 273-280

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1147

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; amyloid-beta protein precursor; cystatin C

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS42029]
  2. National Institute on Aging [AG017617]
  3. American Heart Association [0040102N]
  4. Alzheimer's Association [IIRG-07-59699]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS042029] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG017617] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A role for cystatin C (CysC) in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been suggested by the genetic linkage of a CysC gene (CST3) polymorphism with late-onset AD, the co-localization of CysC with amyloid-beta (A beta) in AD brains, and binding of CysC to soluble A beta in vitro and in mouse models of AD. This study investigates the binding between A beta and CysC in the human central nervous system. While CysC binding to soluble A beta was observed in AD patients and controls, a SDS-resistant CysC/A beta complex was detected exclusively in brains of neuropathologically normal controls, but not in AD cases. The association of CysC with A beta in brain from control individuals and in cerebrospinal fluid reveals an interaction of these two polypeptides in their soluble form. The association between A beta and CysC prevented A beta accumulation and fibrillogenesis in experimental systems, arguing that CysC plays a protective role in the pathogenesis of AD in humans and explains why decreases in CysC concentration caused by the CST3 polymorphism or by specific presenilin 2 mutations can lead to the development of the disease. Thus, enhancing CysC expression or modulating CysC binding to A beta have important disease-modifying effects, suggesting a novel therapeutic intervention for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据