4.5 Article

Activation of Cell Cycle Proteins in Transgenic Mice in Response to Neuronal Loss but not Amyloid-beta and Tau Pathology

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 541-549

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2009-0993

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; apoptosis; Cdk4; cell cycle; PCNA; phospho-histone H3; phospho-Rb; tetracycline-inducible; transgenic mice

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/16381/2004]
  2. NIH/NIA [R01AG027544]
  3. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Postdoctoral Scholar Award
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG027544] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell cycle proteins are elevated in the brain of patients and in transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), suggesting that aberrant cell cycle re-entry plays a key role in this disorder. However, the precise relationship between cell cycle reactivation and the hallmarks of AD, amyloid-beta (A beta) plaques and tau-laden neurofibrillary tangles, remains unclear. We sought to determine whether cell cycle reactivation initiates in direct response to A beta and tau accumulation or whether it occurs as a downstream consequence of neuronal death pathways. Therefore, we used a triple transgenic mouse model of AD (3xTg-AD) that develops plaques and tangles, but does not exhibit extensive neuronal loss, whereas to model hippocampal neuronal death a tetracycline-regulatable transgenic model of neuronal ablation (CaM/Tet-DT(A) mice) was used. Cell-cycle protein activation was determined in these two models of neurodegeneration, using biochemical and histological approaches. Our findings indicate that Cdk4, PCNA and phospho-Rb are significantly elevated in CaM/Tet-DT(A) mice following neuronal death. In contrast, no significant activation of cell-cycle proteins occurs in 3xTg-AD mice versus non-transgenic controls. Taken together, our data indicate that neuronal cell cycle reactivation is not a prominent feature induced by A beta or tau pathology, but rather appears to be triggered by acute neuronal loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据