4.7 Article

Influence of nanocrystal size on the quantum dots sensitized solar cells' performance with low temperature synthesized CdSe quantum dots

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 612, 期 -, 页码 323-329

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.116

关键词

CdSe quantum dots (QDs); Quantum dots-sensitized solar cells (QDSCs); Green synthesized; Self-assembly; Quantum size effect; Power conversion efficiency (PCE)

资金

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B502]
  2. Shanghai Key Laboratory Project [08DZ2230500]
  3. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20120074110018]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51072052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CdSe quantum dots (QDs) were synthesized with ethanol and glycerol under 50-160 degrees C in the present work. The reaction temperature is lower than the traditional solvent thermal method to fabricate the CdSe QDs around 250-350 degrees C. What's more, the avoiding of the use of phosphine contained solvent make the whole reaction environmental friendly. Then 3-Mercaptopropionic (MPA) was used to exchange the CdSe QDs' ligand of olic acid. After that, the MPA-capped CdSe QDs were tethered onto the TiO2's substrate, which guarantee the high coverage of the CdSe QDs on the TiO2 photoanode and the absorption range of 450-560 nm of light harvest. Furthermore, through the results of the CdSe QD's size for the cells' performance, we compared the significance of the QDs' absorption range, the electron injection from the conduction band of CdSe QDs' to TiO2's and polysulfide to the valance band of the CdSe QDs in the cells' performance and discuss the mechanism to improve the efficiency of the QDSCs. Finally, the QDSCs with polysulfide solution and Cu2S as counter electrode show excellent cell performance with open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of 0.6 V, short-circuit current density (J(sc)) of 10.58 mA/cm(2), fill factor (FF) of 0.564, and PCE of 3.7%. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据