4.7 Article

Thermoelectric properties of Au-containing type-I clathrates Ba8AuxGa16-3xGe30+2x

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 587, 期 -, 页码 747-754

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.104

关键词

Thermoelectric materials; Clathrates; Rietveld analysis; Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. DOE [DE-EE0000014, NFE1103595]
  2. General Motors under the Material Science and Technology Division [IAN: 14B673701]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy. Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  4. Department of Energy [DE-AC05000OR22725]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type I clathrates, with compositions based on Ba8Ga16Ge30, are a class of promising thermoelectric materials due to their intrinsically low thermal conductivity. It has been demonstrated previously that the thermoelectric performance can be improved by transition metal substitution of the framework atoms. In this study, the effects of Au substitution for Ga/Ge on thermal and electrical transport properties of type I clathrate compounds have been investigated. Polycrystalline samples with a large range of Au content have been synthesized using conventional solid state techniques with the actual compositions of resulting materials approximately following Zintl-Klemm rules. The charge carrier type changes from electrons (n) to holes (p) as the Au content increases. The Seebeck coefficient (S) and power factor (S-2/rho where rho is the electrical resistivity) were improved by Au substitution and the resulting overall thermoelectric properties were enhanced by Au substitution as compared to polycrystalline Ba8Ga16Ge30. The thermoelectric figure of merit ZT attains a value of 0.63 at 740 K for the composition Ba8Au5.47Ge39.96, a value that is somewhat lower than those reported previously. The results presented herein show that Au-containing type I clathrates are promising p-type thermoelectric materials for high temperature applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据