4.7 Article

Room temperature chemical synthesis of Cu(OH)2 thin films for supercapacitor application

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 573, 期 -, 页码 27-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.193

关键词

Copper hydroxide [Cu(OH)(2)]; Thin films; Room temperature synthesis; X-ray diffraction; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. Human Resource Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [2012-4010203180]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korean government (MEST) [2011-0016564]
  5. Center for Inorganic Photovoltaic Materials [2012-0001170]
  6. Korea Government (MEST)
  7. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20134030200280] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0016564] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Room temperature soft chemical synthesis route is used to grow nanograined copper hydroxide [Cu(OH)(2)] thin films on glass and stainless steel substrates. The structural, morphological, optical and wettability properties of Cu(OH)(2) thin films are studied by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), UV-vis spectrophotometer and water contact angle measurement techniques. The results showed that, room temperature chemical synthesis route allows to form the nanograined and hydrophilic Cu(OH)(2) thin films with optical band gap energy of 3.0 eV. The electrochemical properties of Cu(OH)(2) thin films are studied in an aqueous 1 M NaOH electrolyte using cyclic voltammetry. The sample exhibited supercapacitive behavior with 120 F/g specific capacitance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据