4.7 Article

Enhanced electromagnetic characteristics of carbon nanotubes/carbonyl iron powders complex absorbers in 2-18 GHz ranges

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 509, 期 2, 页码 451-456

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.055

关键词

Carbon nanotube/iron particle composite; Electrical conductivity; Electromagnetic characteristics; Electromagnetic-wave absorbing property

资金

  1. National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA03A209]
  2. National Defense Fundamental Research Project [D1420061057]
  3. Natural Scientific Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y4100022]
  4. New Bud Talents Grant from Zhejiang Province [ZC323010035]
  5. Doctoral Start-up Foundation from Zhejiang Normal University [ZC304009094]
  6. Zhejiang Normal University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electromagnetic (EM) characteristics of the carbon nanotubes/carbonyl iron powders (CNTs/CIPs) complex absorbers synthesized by mixing CNTs with CIPs were studied at 2-18 GHz, for the aim of the absorbing coating with thinness, lightness, width, and strength. Compared with CIPs, the CNTs/CIPs composites had higher electrical conductivity, permittivity, and dielectric loss, which gradually increased with the increasing CNTs content (Waifs). Among them, with W-CNTs = 2.2%, a reflection loss (R-L) exceeding -20 dB was obtained in the frequency range of 6.4-14.8 GHz for a coating thickness of 1.2-2.5 mm. Particularly, a minimum R-L of 33.3 dB was found at 11.2 GHz corresponding to a matching thickness of 1.5 mm. The excellent EM-wave absorption properties are a consequence of a proper EM matching and enhanced absorption abilities resulting from the addition of a small quantity of CNTs with high electrical conductivity, permittivity, and dielectric loss. Thus, CNTs/CIPs complex absorbers may be promising candidates for EM-wave-absorption materials with strong-absorption, thin-thickness, light-weight, and low-cost. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据