4.7 Article

Chemical synthesis and electrochemical analysis of nickel cobaltite nanostructures for supercapacitor applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 509, 期 23, 页码 6677-6682

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.136

关键词

Oxide materials; Thin films; Chemical synthesis; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) [M2009010025]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) of Republic of Korea [K20901000006-09E0100-00610]
  3. Hanyang University [HYU-2011-T]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10031733, K0006060] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-00475] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel cobaltite (NiCo2O4) films containing nanorods and nanoflakes are synthesized on indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates by a chemical bath deposition method and calcination process at 300 degrees C for 3 h. The NiCo2O4/ITO films are used as electrodes for supercapacitor applications, and electrochemical properties of the NiCo2O4 nanostructures are examined by cyclic voltammetry and charge-discharge experiments. NiCo2O4 nanorods exhibit the largest specific capacitance, with a value of 490 F g(-1)at energy and power densities of 45Whkg(-1) and 2kWkg(-1), respectively. This is significantly better than the performance of NiCo2O4 nanoflakes. Cycle-life tests show that the specific capacitance of NiCo2O4 is stable even after 1000 cycles, indicating its high potential for supercapacitor applications. The low cost and environmental friendliness of NiCo2O4 nanorods, coupled with its high supercapacitor performance, offer advantages over other transition metal oxides used for supercapacitors. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据