4.8 Article

A new reversal mode in exchange coupled antiferromagnetic/ferromagnetic disks: distorted viscous vortex

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 7, 期 21, 页码 9878-9885

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr01856k

关键词

-

资金

  1. US NSF [DMR-1008791, ECCS-1232275]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MinECO) [MAT2010-20616-C02, CSD2007-00041, MAT2012-35370]
  4. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Materials Science and Engineering Division
  5. DOE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. NSFC [11328402]
  7. ICREA Academia - Generalitat de Catalunya
  8. Severo Ochoa Program (MinECO) [SEV-2013-0295]
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1232275] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Materials Research
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008791] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1232275] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic vortices have generated intense interest in recent years due to their unique reversal mechanisms, fascinating topological properties, and exciting potential applications. In addition, the exchange coupling of magnetic vortices to antiferromagnets has also been shown to lead to a range of novel phenomena and functionalities. Here we report a new magnetization reversal mode of magnetic vortices in exchange coupled Ir20Mn80/Fe20Ni80 microdots: distorted viscous vortex reversal. In contrast to the previously known or proposed reversal modes, the vortex is distorted close to the interface and viscously dragged due to the uncompensated spins of a thin antiferromagnet, which leads to unexpected asymmetries in the annihilation and nucleation fields. These results provide a deeper understanding of the physics of exchange coupled vortices and may also have important implications for applications involving exchange coupled nanostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据