4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Dye-sensitized solar cell using natural dyes extracted from spinach and ipomoea

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 495, 期 2, 页码 606-610

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.057

关键词

DSSCs; TiO2 nanoparticles; Electrophoresis deposition; Ipomoea; Spinach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used spinach extract, ipomoea leaf extract and their mixed extracts as the natural dyes for a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) Spinach and ipomoea leaves were first placed separately in ethanol and the chlorophyll of these two kinds of plants was extracted to serve as the natural dyes for using in DSSCs In addition, the self-developed nanofluid synthesis system prepared a TiO2 nanofluid with an average particle size of 50 nm Electrophoresis deposition was performed to let the TiO2 deposit nanoparticles on the indium tin oxide (ITO) conductive glass, forming a TiO2 thin film with the thickness of 11.61 mu m This TiO2 thin film underwent sintering at 450 degrees C to enhance the compactness of thin film Finally, the sintered TiO2 thin film was immersed in the natural dye solutions extracted from spinach and ipomoea leaves, completing the production of the anode of DSSC This study then further inspected the fill factor, photoelectric conversion efficiency and incident photon current efficiency of the encapsulated DSSC According to the experimental results of current-voltage curve, the photoelectric conversion efficiency of the DSSCs prepared by natural dyes from ipomoea leaf extract is 0.318% under extraction temperature of 50 degrees C and pH value of extraction fluid at 1.0 This paper also investigated the influence of the temperature in the extraction process of this kind of natural dye and the influence of pH value of the dye solution on the UV-VIS patterns absorption spectra of the prepared natural dye solutions, and the influence of these two factors on the photoelectric conversion efficiency of DSSC. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据