4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Study of annealing effects on structural and sorption properties of low energy mechanically alloyed AB5's

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 495, 期 2, 页码 541-544

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.248

关键词

Hydrogen storage materials; Intermetallics; Mechanical alloying; X-ray diffraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, various AB(5)'s were mechanically alloyed using a low energy mill until final or completion milling stages were reached. This process leaves micro- and nano-structured materials with highly distorted microstructures Then, further annealing is needed to obtain an intermetallic suitable for hydrogen thermal compression process After milling, the samples were annealed and analyzed by X-ray diffraction and Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Hydriding properties were studied using volumetric methods After annealing at 200 degrees C for 24 h no changes occur in neither structural nor hydriding properties For samples annealed at 400 degrees C, relaxation effects of the structure were observed. It occurs due to the release of strain produced by annealing on the microstructure It leads to the improvements in both structural and hydriding properties. Strong recrystallization effect was present between 400 and 600 degrees C At 600 degrees C, the main improvements were larger crystallite size, lower strain values and pressure-composition isotherms with well-defined plateaus. Despite this behavior, no evidence of crystallization was observed by Differential Scanning Calorimetry measurements from room temperature up to 500 degrees C These topics, the amount of energy supplied during mechanical alloying and the correlation between the structural and sorption properties are discussed according to the governing mechanisms of recrystallization observed in each temperature range From these results, an improved synthesis-thermal treatment method is outlined (C) 2009 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据