4.7 Article

Characterization of MgH2 formation by low-energy ball-milling of Mg and Mg plus C (graphite) mixtures under H2 atmosphere

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 481, 期 1-2, 页码 673-680

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.056

关键词

Metal hydrides; Mechanical alloying; Thermal analysis; Microstructure; Magnesium

资金

  1. FONCyT PICT [12-12453]
  2. PICT [821, 20400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work the formation of nanocrystalline magnesium hydride by reactive mechanical alloying (RMA) of a mixture of magnesium and 10 wt.% graphite flakes is reported. The synthesis was done at room temperature under 5 bar of hydrogen using a low-energy milling device. Magnesium without graphite was also milled as a reference material. We determine phase evolution by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal dehydriding properties by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and morphological and microstructural characteristics by laser granulometry, BET surface analysis, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), at different stages of the milling process. The formation of MgH2 occurs faster in the graphite added material, due to the lubricant properties of graphite. It reaches a hydrogen capacity of 6.2 +/- 0.1 wt.% H in 50 h, whereas the reference material needs 100 h to load 7.1 +/- 0.1 wt.% H. During the synthesis, both materials follow the same sequence of microstructural and morphological changes, though in different time scales. After the synthesis, both materials present similar microstructural and morphological characteristics. As regards dehydriding properties, we found that graphite plays a catalytic role in the decomposition of magnesium hydride. The graphite added material decomposes always at lower temperatures than the reference material. Additionally, we observe that particle size instead of crystallite size is the relevant property that influences hydrogen desorption kinetics. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据