4.7 Article

Grading local side effects of sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: Speaking the same language

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.039

关键词

Sublingual immunotherapy; safety; local side effects; grading

资金

  1. Stallergenes
  2. Actelion
  3. Almirall
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Chiesi
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Merck
  8. MSD
  9. Novartis
  10. OM Pharma
  11. Sanofi-Aventis
  12. Schering-Plough
  13. Teva
  14. Uriach
  15. Meda
  16. ALK-Abello
  17. Circassia
  18. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma Immunology
  19. American Board of Allergy and Immunology
  20. Sharp Dohme (Mexico)
  21. Diemsa
  22. Danone
  23. Takeda
  24. Myland Laboratories
  25. Sanofi
  26. ALA
  27. World Allergy Organization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is increasingly used worldwide. Despite its safety being well ascertained, there is no universally accepted system to grade and classify its adverse events (AEs). According to the literature, it seems reasonable to classify and grade systemic side effects by using the previously published World Allergy Organization recommendations. On the other hand, local side effects are the most frequent with SLIT, sometimes leading to its discontinuation. Therefore grading of the severity of local side effects was perceived as necessary for the purpose of uniform reporting, classification, and quantification of this aspect. A World Allergy Organization Taskforce, after examining the available literature and the postmarketing surveillance data, proposed a clinically based grading of the severity of local AEs caused by SLIT. The use of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities nomenclature for AEs was also included in this context. The proposed grading system for SLIT-induced local reactions is expected to improve and harmonize surveillance and reporting of the safety of SLIT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据