4.7 Review

Small-airways dysfunction associates with respiratory symptoms and clinical features of asthma: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 3, 页码 646-657

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.1567

关键词

Small-airways disease; asthma; phenotypes; asthma control

资金

  1. Dutch Asthma Foundation
  2. NWO
  3. ZonMw
  4. SAB
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Chiesi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditionally, asthma has been considered a disease that predominantly involves the large airways. Today, this concept is being challenged, and increasing evidence has become available showing that abnormalities in the small airways also contribute to the clinical expression of asthma. The small airways can be affected by inflammation, remodeling, and changes in the surrounding tissue, all contributing to small-airways dysfunction. In this article we have performed a systematic review of the literature on the association between small-airways dysfunction and clinical signs and symptoms of asthma. This review shows that small-airways dysfunction associates with worse control of asthma, higher numbers of exacerbations, the presence of nocturnal asthma, more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness, exercise-induced asthma, and the late-phase allergic response. Importantly, small-airways dysfunction can already be present in patients with mild asthma. Our review provides suggestive evidence that a better response of the small airways to inhaled steroids or montelukast associates with better asthma control. For this reason, an early recognition of small-airways dysfunction is important because it enables the physician to start timely treatment to target the small airways. It is important to develop simpler and more reliable tools (eg, questionnaires or bronchial provocation tests with small-particle stimuli) to assess the presence and extent of small-airways dysfunction in daily clinical practice. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;131:646-57.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据