4.7 Article

Update on allergy immunotherapy: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/PRACTALL consensus report

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 5, 页码 1288-U65

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.049

关键词

Allergen immunotherapy; atopic disease; immune tolerance

资金

  1. NIH
  2. Wallace Research Foundation
  3. Abbott Laboratories
  4. Mylan Specialty
  5. Novartis
  6. Stallergenes
  7. Genentech
  8. Merck
  9. AAAAI
  10. European Commission
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation
  12. Global Allergy
  13. Asthma European Network
  14. Christine Kuhne-Center for Allergy Research and Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic asthma and rhinitis, as well as venom-induced anaphylaxis. In addition to reducing symptoms, AIT can change the course of allergic disease and induce allergen-specific immune tolerance. In current clinical practice immunotherapy is delivered either subcutaneously or sublingually; some allergens, such as grass pollen, can be delivered through either route, whereas others, such as venoms, are only delivered subcutaneously. Both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy appear to have a duration of efficacy of up to 12 years, and both can prevent the development of asthma and new allergen sensitivities. In spite of the advances with AIT, safer and more effective AIT strategies are needed, especially for patients with asthma, atopic dermatitis, or food allergy. Novel approaches to improve AIT include use of adjuvants or recombinant allergens and alternate routes of administration. As part of the PRACTALL initiatives, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology nominated an expert team to develop a comprehensive consensus report on the mechanisms of AIT and its use in clinical practice, as well as unmet needs and ongoing developments in AIT. This resulting report is endorsed by both academies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据