4.7 Article

High prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with inherited connective tissue disorders

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 132, 期 2, 页码 378-386

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.030

关键词

Eosinophilic esophagitis; eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease; eosinophil; connective tissue disorders; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; Marfan syndrome; hypermobility syndrome

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Food Allergy Research and Education
  2. Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network
  3. Buckeye Foundation
  4. Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases (CURED) Foundation
  5. Meritage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging chronic inflammatory disease mediated by immune hypersensitization to multiple foods and strongly associated with atopy and esophageal remodeling. Objective: We provide clinical and molecular evidence indicating a high prevalence of EoE in patients with inherited connective tissue disorders (CTDs). Methods: We examined the rate of EoE among patients with CTDs and subsequently analyzed esophageal mRNA transcript profiles in patients with EoE with or without CTD features. Results: We report a cohort of 42 patients with EoE with a CTD-like syndrome, representing 0.8% of patients with CTDs and 1.3% of patients with EoE within our hospital-wide electronic medical record database and our EoE research registry, respectively. An 8-fold risk of EoE in patients with CTDs (relative risk, 8.1; 95% confidence limit, 5.1-12.9; chi(2) 1=5 112.0; P < 10(-3)) was present compared with the general population. Esophageal transcript profiling identified a distinct subset of genes, including COL8A2, in patients with EoE and CTDs. Conclusion: There is a remarkable association of EoE with CTDs and evidence for a differential expression of genes involved in connective tissue repair in this cohort. Thus, we propose stratification of patients with EoE and CTDs into a subset referred to as EoE-CTD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据