4.7 Article

Respiratory health effects of air pollution: Update on biomass smoke and traffic pollution

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.021

关键词

Biomass; traffic; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; asthma; air pollutants; particulate matter

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P30 ES005022]
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency STAR [RD 83457901]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES005022] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mounting evidence suggests that air pollution contributes to the large global burden of respiratory and allergic diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and possibly tuberculosis. Although associations between air pollution and respiratory disease are complex, recent epidemiologic studies have led to an increased recognition of the emerging importance of traffic-related air pollution in both developed and less-developed countries, as well as the continued importance of emissions from domestic fires burning biomass fuels, primarily in the less-developed world. Emissions from these sources lead to personal exposures to complex mixtures of air pollutants that change rapidly in space and time because of varying emission rates, distances from source, ventilation rates, and other factors. Although the high degree of variability in personal exposure to pollutants from these sources remains a challenge, newer methods for measuring and modeling these exposures are beginning to unravel complex associations with asthma and other respiratory tract diseases. These studies indicate that air pollution from these sources is a major preventable cause of increased incidence and exacerbation of respiratory disease. Physicians can help to reduce the risk of adverse respiratory effects of exposure to biomass and traffic air pollutants by promoting awareness and supporting individual and community-level interventions. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 3-11.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据