4.7 Article

Different effects of pimecrolimus and betamethasone on the skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 123, 期 5, 页码 1124-1133

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.032

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; skin barrier; pimecrolimus; corticosteroid; skin penetration

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB415/B2, SFB617/A7, A21]
  2. Novartis Pharma, Nurnberg (Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genetic defects leading to skin barrier dysfunction were recognized as risk factors for atopic dermatitis (AD). It is essential that drugs applied to patients with AD restore the impaired epidermal barrier to prevent sensitization by environmental allergens. Objectives: We investigated the effect of 2 common treatments, a calcineurin inhibitor and a corticosteroid, on the skin barrier. Methods: In a randomized study 15 patients with AD were treated on one upper limb with pimecrolimus and on the other with betamethasone twice daily for 3 weeks. Results: Stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss, a marker of the inside-outside barrier, improved in both groups. Dye penetration, a marker of the outside-inside barrier, was also reduced in both drugs. Electron microscopic evaluation of barrier structure displayed prevalently ordered stratum corneum lipid layers and regular lamellar body extrusion in pimecrolimus-treated skin but inconsistent extracellular lipid bilayers and only partially filled lamellar bodies after betamethasone treatment. Both drugs normalized epidermal differentiation and reduced epidermal hyperproliferation. Betamethasone was superior in reducing clinical symptoms and epidermal proliferation; however, it led to epidermal thinning. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that both betamethasone and pimecrolimus improve clinical and biophysical parameters and epidermal differentiation. Because pimecrolimus improved the epidermal barrier and did not cause atrophy, it might be more suitable for long-term treatment of AD. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;123:1124-33.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据