4.7 Review

Oxidants and the pathogenesis of lung diseases

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 456-468

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.08.004

关键词

oxidative stress; antioxidant; genetics; susceptibility; infant; reproductive outcome; premature; children; elderly; asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ozone; pollutants; particulates; PM; acute respiratory distress syndrome; hyperoxia; SNP; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing number of population-based and epiderniologic associations between oxidant pollutant exposures and cardiopulmonary disease exacerbation, decrements in pulmonary function, and mortality underscores the important detrimental effects of oxidants on public health. Because inhaled oxidants initiate a number of pathologic processes, including inflammation of the airways, which may contribute to the pathogenesis and/or exacerbation of airways disease, it is critical to understand the mechanisms through which exogenous and endogenous oxidants interact with molecules in the cells, tissues, and epithelial lining fluid of the lung. Furthermore, it is clear that interindividual variation in response to a given exposure also exists across an individual lifetime. Because of the potential impact that oxidant exposures may have on reproductive outcomes and infant, child, and adult health, identification of the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may influence susceptibility to oxidants remains an important issue. In this review, we discuss mechanisms of oxidant stress in the lung, the role of oxidants in lung disease pathogenesis and exacerbation (eg, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute respiratory distress syndrome), and the potential risk factors (eg, age, genetics) for enhanced susceptibility to oxidant-induced disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据