4.7 Article

The Inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) study 5-year follow-up: Effectiveness of early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 1167-1174

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.029

关键词

mild persistent asthma; recent-onset asthma; budesonide dry-powder inhalet; inhaled corticosteroid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) study enrolled 7241 patients aged 5 to 66 years with recent-onset, mild persistent asthma to assess early intervention with the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide on long-term asthma control. Objective: The open-label phase of the START study was included to determine the effect on lung function and asthma control of adding budesonide to the reference group patients who had not initially received inhaled corticosteroids. Methods: Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with budesonide, 200 mu g (those aged <11 years) or 400 mu g once daily, or placebo plus the usual asthma therapy for 3 years, after which all patients received 2 years of open-label treatment with budesonide once daily. Results: During the full 5-year study period, postbronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted decreased, irrespective of randomized treatment during the double-blind phase, by an average of 2.22% (SE, 0.15%). However, patients with inhaled budesonide in the double-blind phase had a significantly lower risk (odds ratio, 0.61; P <.001) of a severe asthma-related event during the full 5-year study period than those in the reference group. Moreover, patients in the reference group used more additional asthma medications during both the open-label and double-blind phases. Conclusions: In mild persistent asthma early intervention with inhaled budesonide was associated with improved asthma control and less additional asthma medication use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据