4.8 Review

Enhanced stability of Pt nanoparticle electrocatalysts for fuel cells

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 418-440

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0695-5

关键词

Pt catalysts; stability; strong metal-support interaction (SMSI); novel carbon nonmaterial; hybrid supports

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB215500, 2012CB720300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20936008, 21176271, 21276291, 21376284, 21436003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have received broad attention due to their virtually zero emission, high power density, and high efficiency, at present the limited stability of the electrocatalysts used in PEMFCs is a critical limitation to their large-scale commercialization. As a type of popularly used electrocatalyst material, carbon black supported platinum (Pt/C)-although highly efficient-undergoes corrosion of carbon, Pt dissolution, Ostwald ripening, and aggregation of Pt nanoparticles (NPs) under harsh chemical and electrochemical oxidation conditions, which results in performance degradation of the electrocatalysts. In order to overcome these disadvantages, many groups have tried to improve the carbon support materials on which Pt is loaded. It has been found that some novel carbon nanomaterials and noncarbon materials with high surface areas, sufficient anchoring sites, high electrical conductivities, and high oxidation resistance under the strongly oxidizing condition in PEMFCs are ideal alternative supports. This review highlights the following aspects: (i) Recent advances in using novel carbon nanomaterials and noncarbon support materials to enhance the long-term durability of electrocatalysts; (ii) solutions to improve the electrical conductivity, surface area, and the strong interaction between metal and supports; and (iii) the synergistic effects in hybrid supports which help improve the stability of electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据