4.8 Article

Wafer-scale arrayed p-n junctions based on few-layer epitaxial GaTe

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 3332-3341

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0833-8

关键词

GaTe; wafer-scale two-dimensional materials; p-n junction; imaging; photodiode; photosensor

资金

  1. National Young 1000 Talent Plan
  2. Pujiang Talent Plan in Shanghai
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61322407, 11474058, 11322441]
  4. Chinese National Science Fund for Talent Training in Basic Science [J1103204]
  5. Ten Thousand Talents Program for young talents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted substantial attention in electronic and optoelectronic applications with the superior advantages of being flexible, transparent, and highly tunable. Gapless graphene exhibits ultra-broadband and fast photoresponse while the 2D semiconducting MoS2 and GaTe exhibit high sensitivity and tunable responsivity to visible light. However, the device yield and repeatability call for further improvement to achieve large-scale uniformity. Here, we report a layer-by-layer growth of wafer-scale GaTe with a high hole mobility of 28.4 cm(2)/(V center dot s) by molecular beam epitaxy. The arrayed p-n junctions were developed by growing few-layer GaTe directly on three-inch Si wafers. The resultant diodes reveal good rectifying characteristics and a high photovoltaic external quantum efficiency up to 62% at 4.8 A mu W under zero bias. The photocurrent reaches saturation fast enough to capture a time constant of 22 A mu s and shows no sign of device degradation after 1.37 million cycles of operation. Most strikingly, such high performance has been achieved across the entire wafer, making the volume production of devices accessible. Finally, several photoimages were acquired by the GaTe/Si photodiodes with reasonable contrast and spatial resolution, demonstrating the potential of integrating the 2D materials with silicon technology for novel optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据