4.7 Article

Effective prevention and therapy of experimental allergic asthma using a GATA-3-specific DNAzyme

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 910-916

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.1175

关键词

allergic asthma; GATA-3; DNAzymes; T(H)2 cells; antisense DNA; small interference RNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Allergic bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. The transcription factor GATA-3 was shown to play an important role in T(H)2 cell activation, but also in the regulation of other cell types involved in bronchial asthma including mast cells, eosinophils, and epithelial cells. DNAzymes represent a new class of antisense molecules that combines the specificity of DNA base pairing with an inherent RNA-cleaving enzymatic activity. Objective: To develop a GATA-3 mRNA-specific DNAzyme and analyze its allergy-preventing activity in murine models of experimental allergic asthma. Methods: The most active DNAzyme (termed gd21) was selected by in vitro cleavage assays. Allergic airway inflammation was assessed by inflammatory cell and cytokine analysis within bronchoalveolar lavage. Lung histology, including goblet cell hyperplasia and lung function, was analyzed using head-out body-plethysmography. Results: Intranasal administration of gd21 prevented airway inflammation and mucus production and inhibited development of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in models of acute allergic airway inflammation. Similar effects were also detected in a model of chronic experimental asthma. Interestingly, gd21 was at least as effective as other antisense molecules, and off-target effects were not detected. Further experiments indicated that pulmonary surfactant may facilitate the cellular uptake of gd21 by acting as an endogenous transfectant. Conclusion: These results indicate that topical application of the GATA-3-specific DNAzyme is a promising novel approach for the treatment of allergic bronchial asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据