4.8 Article

Solution-Processed Transistors Using Colloidal Nanocrystals with Composition-Matched Molecular Solders: Approaching Single Crystal Mobility

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 6309-6317

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01258

关键词

nanocrystals; nanoheterostructures; molecular solder; inorganic ligands; field-effect transistor; electron mobility; switching speed

资金

  1. DOD ONR Award [N00014-13-1-0490]
  2. NSF [DMR-1310398]
  3. II-VI Foundation
  4. University of Chicago NSF MRSEC Program [DMR 14-20709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crystalline silicon-based complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors have become a dominant platform for today's electronics. For such devices, expensive and complicated vacuum processes are used in the preparation of active layers. This increases cost and restricts the scope of applications. Here, we demonstrate high-performance solution-processed CdSe nanocrystal (NC) field-effect transistors (FETs) that exhibit very high carrier mobilities (over 400 cm(2)/(V s)). This is comparable to the carrier mobilities of crystalline silicon-based transistors. Furthermore, our NC FETs exhibit high operational stability and MHz switching speeds. These NC FETs are prepared by spin coating colloidal solutions of CdSe NCs capped with molecular solders [Cd2Se3](2-) onto various oxide gate dielectrics followed by thermal annealing. We show that the nature of gate dielectrics plays an important role in soldered CdSe NC FETs. The capacitance of dielectrics and the NC electronic structure near gate dielectric affect the distribution of localized traps and trap filling, determining carrier mobility and operational stability of the NC FETs. We expand the application of the NC soldering process to core shell NCs consisting of a III-V InAs core and a CdSe shell with composition-matched [Cd2Se3](2-) molecular solders. Soldering CdSe shells forms nanoheterostructured material that combines high electron mobility and near-IR photoresponse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据