4.8 Article

Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties in Bulk Nanowire Heterostructure-Based Nanocomposites through Minority Carrier Blocking

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 1349-1355

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl504624r

关键词

Thermoelectric; heterostructures; PbTe; Ag2Te; nanocomposites; minority carrier blocking

资金

  1. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-12-1-0061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To design superior thermoelectric materials the minority carrier blocking effect in which the unwanted bipolar transport is prevented by the interfacial energy barriers in the heterogeneous nanostructures has been theoretically proposed recently. The theory predicts an enhanced power factor and a reduced bipolar thermal conductivity for materials with a relatively low doping level, which could lead to an improvement in the thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT). Here we show the first experimental demonstration of the minority carrier blocking in lead telluridesilver telluride (PbTeAg2Te) nanowire heterostructure-based nanocomposites. The nanocomposites are made by sintering PbTeAg2Te nanowire heterostructures produced in a highly scalable solution-phase synthesis. Compared with Ag2Te nanowire-based nanocomposite produced in similar method, the PbTeAg2Te nanocomposite containing similar to 5 atomic % PbTe exhibits enhanced Seebeck coefficient, reduced thermal conductivity, and similar to 40% improved ZT, which can be well explained by the theoretical modeling based on the Boltzmann transport equations when energy barriers for both electrons and holes at the heterostructure interfaces are considered in the calculations. For this p-type PbTeAg2Te nanocomposite, the barriers for electrons, that is, minority carriers, are primarily responsible for the ZT enhancement. By extending this approach to other nanostructured systems, it represents a key step toward low-cost solution-processable nanomaterials without heavy doping level for high-performance thermoelectric energy harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据