4.6 Article

Mitigating heat and chilling stress by adjusting the sowing date of maize in the North China Plain

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE
卷 205, 期 1, 页码 77-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jac.12299

关键词

agronomy adaptation; chilling stress; extreme heat; high grain yield

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0300301]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31501265]
  3. Chinese National Basic Research Program [2015CB150402]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017QC102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The North China Plain (NCP) is one of the major areas of cereal production, and in recent years its maize (Zea mays L.) production has been influenced by both heat and chilling stresses. Adjusting the sowing date is an effective measure for mitigating these stresses. However, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We performed a 5-year field experiment to determine how the sowing date mitigated heat and chilling stresses at Wuqiao Experimental Station in the NCP with three treatments: early sowing (ES), middle sowing (MS), and late sowing (LS). In all 5 years, higher grain yields were observed in the MS (averaged 11.7 Mg/ha) and LS (averaged 11.4Mg/ha) treatments compared with the ES (averaged 10.9Mg/ha) treatment. The lower yield in ES treatment mainly resulted from high temperature 5 days pre-silking and 5 days post-silking (>31.8 degrees C). In 2015 and 2016, the lower grain yield in LS (11.4Mg/ha in 2015 and 11.2Mg/ha in 2016) treatment compared with MS (12.1Mg/ha in 2015 and 11.9Mg/ha in 2016) was mainly because the minimum temperature was <13.0 degrees C 5 days before maturity or <13.6 degrees C 10 days before maturity. Long-term weather data further verified middle sowing would be appropriate in a changing climate. Therefore, we can conclude that sowing date manipulation constitutes a useful method for mitigating heat and chilling stresses for maize production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据