4.5 Article

Adaptation to increasing severity of phoma stem canker on winter oilseed rape in the UK under climate change

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 683-694

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S002185961000064X

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA, OREGIN)
  3. Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate
  4. British Society for Plant Pathology
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I017585/1, BBS/E/C/00004693, BB/D015200/1, BB/E001610/1, BBS/E/C/00004938] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/D015200/1, BB/E001610/1, BBS/E/C/00004938, BB/I017585/1, BBS/E/C/00004958] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various adaptation strategies are available that will minimize or negate predicted climate change-related increases in yield loss from phoma stem canker in UK winter oilseed rape (OSR) production. A number of forecasts for OSR yield, national production and subsequent economic values are presented, providing estimates of impacts on both yield and value for different levels of adaptation. Under future climate change scenarios, there will be increasing pressure to maintain yields at current levels. Losses can be minimized in the short term (up to the 2020s) with a 'low'-adaptation strategy, which essentially requires some farmer-led changes towards best management practices. However, the predicted impacts of climate change can be negated and, in most cases, improved upon, with 'high'adaptation strategies. This requires increased funding from both the public and private sectors and more directed efforts at adaptation from the producer. Most literature on adaptation to climate change has had a conceptual focus with little quantification of impacts. It is argued that quantifying the impacts of adaptation is essential to provide clearer information to guide policy and industry approaches to future climate change risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据