4.7 Article

Oleanolic Acid Induces Metabolic Adaptation in Cancer Cells by Activating the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 62, 期 24, 页码 5528-5537

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf500622p

关键词

aerobic glycolysis; AMPK; metabolism; oleanolic acid

资金

  1. national innovative drug development project [2014ZX-09102043-001]
  2. 863 High Technology Project [2014AA093503]
  3. National Foundation of Natural Science of China [81302906, 81273550, 41306157]
  4. Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Nonprofit Institutes, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences [2013B01YQ01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cells are well-known to require a constant supply of protein, lipid, RNA, and DNA via altered metabolism for accelerated cell proliferation. Targeting metabolic pathways is, therefore, a promising therapeutic strategy for cancers. Oleanolic acid (OA) is widely distributed in dietary and medicinal plants and displays a selective cytotoxicity to cancer cells, primarily by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. This study investigated if OA inhibited growth of tumor cells by affecting their metabolism. OA was found to activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), the master regulator of metabolism, in prostate cancer cell line PC-3 and breast cancer cell line MCF-7. AMPK activation is required for the antitumor activity of OA on cancer cells. Lipogenesis, protein synthesis, and aerobic glycolysis were inhibited in cancer cells treated with OA, in an AMPK activation-dependent manner. The metabolic alteration was shown to mediate the tumor suppressor activity of OA on cancer cells. Collectively, this study provides evidence that OA, as a widely distributed nutritional component, is able to exert antitumor function by interfering in the metabolic pathway in cancer cells. This finding should encourage researchers to study if affecting cancer metabolism is a common mechanism by which nutritional compounds suppress cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据