4.7 Article

Genetic and Biochemical Evidence That Recombinant Enterococcus spp. Strains Expressing Gelatinase (GelE) Produce Bovine Milk-Derived Hydrolysates with High Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-Inhibitory Activity (ACE-IA)

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 62, 期 24, 页码 5555-5564

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf5006269

关键词

lactic acid bacteria (LAB); Enterococcus faecalis; gelatinase (GelE); serine protease (SprE); ACE-inhibitory peptides; antihypertensive peptides

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [AGL2012-34829]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [AGL2009-08348, AGL2011-24643]
  3. CENIT project from the MITC-CDTI
  4. BSCH-UCM [GR35-10A]
  5. Comunidad de Madrid (CAM) [S2009/AGR-1489, P2013/ABI-2747]
  6. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (MEC)
  7. CAM
  8. MICINN, Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, genes encoding gelatinase (gelE) and serine proteinase (sprE), two extracellular proteases produced by Enterococcus faecalis DBH18, were cloned in the protein expression vector pMG36c, containing the constitutive P-32 promoter, generating the recombinant plasmids pCG, pCSP, and pCGSP encoding gelE, sprE, and gelE sprE, respectively. Transformation of noncaseinolytic E. faecalis P36, E. faecalis JH2-2, E. faecium AR24, and E. hirae AR14 strains with these plasmids permitted detection of caseinolytic activity only in the strains transformed with pCG or pCGSP. Complementation of a deletion (knockout) mutant of E. faecalis V583 for production of gelatinase (GelE) with pCG unequivocally supported that gelE is responsible for the caseinolytic activity of the transformed strain grown in bovine skim milk (BSM). RP-HPLC-MS/MS analysis of hydrolysates of transformed Enterococcus spp. strains grown in BSM permitted the identification of 38 major peptide fragments including peptides with previously reported angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitory activity (ACE-IA), antihypertensive activity, and antioxidant activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据