4.7 Review

Accumulation of High-Value Lipids in Single-Cell Microorganisms: A Mechanistic Approach and Future Perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 62, 期 13, 页码 2709-2727

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf4042134

关键词

lipid droplets; microbial lipids; triacylglycerols; sterol esters; polyhydroxyalkanoate

资金

  1. National Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) [291795]
  2. Institute of Health [U24 DK097154]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01HD059127, R01HD065122, R01HD061923, R21AT006180, R01AT007079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years attention has been focused on the utilization of microorganisms as alternatives for industrial and nutritional applications. Considerable research has been devoted to techniques for growth, extraction, and purification of high-value lipids for their use as biofuels and biosurfactants as well as high-value metabolites for nutrition and health. These successes argue that the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the microbial biosynthesis of such molecules, which are far from being completely understood, now will yield spectacular opportunities for industrial scale biomolecular production. There are important additional questions to be solved to optimize the processing strategies to take advantage of the assets of microbial lipids. The present review describes the current state of knowledge regarding lipid biosynthesis, accumulation, and transport mechanisms present in single-cell organisms, specifically yeasts, microalgae, bacteria, and archaea. Similarities and differences in biochemical pathways and strategies of different microorganisms provide a diverse toolset to the expansion of biotechnologies for lipid production. This paper is intended to inspire a generation of lipid scientists to insights that will drive the biotechnologies of microbial production as uniquely enabling players of lipid biotherapeutics, biofuels, biomaterials, and other opportunity areas into the 21st century.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据