4.8 Article

Multifunctional MRI/PET Nanobeacons Derived from the in Situ Self-Assembly of Translational Polymers and Clinical Cargo through Coalescent Intermolecular Forces

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 8032-8043

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03370

关键词

Lymph node resection; Cerenkov-guided surgery; combination therapy

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  2. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  3. Starr Cancer Consortium [I4-A427]
  4. NIH [1R01CA183953-01A1, R01EB014944, 1 S10 OD016207-01]
  5. National Science Foundation [DGS 0965983]
  6. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [W81XWH-12-1-0509]
  7. MSKCC NIH Core Grant [P30-CA008748]
  8. MSKCC's Experimental Therapeutics Center
  9. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research
  10. Center for Experimental Therapeutics of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  11. Center of Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel multifunctional platforms are needed for oncology in order to assist physicians during surgery and chemotherapy. In the present study, we show that polymeric nanobeacons, consisting of the glucose-based polymer dextran, can be used to guide surgery and improve drug delivery. For imaging, the nanobeacons stably retained the positron emitter 89-zirconium and the MRI contrast agent gadolinium, without the need of a chelator. In addition to using them for PET imaging, the Zr-89-nanobeacons guided the surgical resection of sentinel lymph nodes, utilizing their inherent Cerenkov luminescence. Through weak electrostatic interactions, the nanoparticles carried combinations of chemotherapeutics for the simultaneous inhibition of oncogenic pathways, resulting in enhanced tumor regression. The nanobeacons also allowed monitoring of drug release via MRI, through the quenching of the gadolinium signal by the coloaded drug, making them a new multifunctional theranostic nanotechnology platform for the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据