4.7 Article

Identification of Rice Proteins Recognized by the IgE Antibodies of Patients with Food Allergies

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 37, 页码 8851-8860

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf402759f

关键词

food allergy; thermal processing; potential rice allergens; basophil activation test; skin prick test

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GA310/07/0414, 310/08/H077]
  2. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA500200801]
  3. Grant Agency of Charles University [GAUK 598213]
  4. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TA01010737]
  5. Institutional Research Concept Grant [RVO61388971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Similarity among food allergens is a great problem affecting the specificity of diagnosis and treatment of allergic patients. We have observed that 80% of patients with food (including wheat) and pollen allergies have increased IgE antibodies against rice proteins. By immunoblotting, we documented that boiling decreased solubility and IgE reactivity of PBS-extracted rice and wheat proteins, yet in SDS extracts this reactivity was only slightly changed. The sera of patients highly positive on the IgE immunoblot and positive in basophil activation and skin prick test with boiled rice components were used for characterizing the IgE-binding proteins separated by 1D or 2D electrophoresis. Using mass spectrometry, we identified 22 rice SDS soluble proteins. Six of them were new thermostable potential rice allergens: glutelin C precursor, granule-bound starch synthase 1 protein, disulfide isomerase-like 1-1 protein, hypothetical protein OsI_13867, putative acid phosphatase precursor 1, and a protein encoded by locus Os02g0453600. All of the identified rice proteins differed from known wheat allergens, except proteins belonging to the alpha-amylase/trypsin inhibitor family. Furthermore, we would suggest that in patients with high IgE reactivity to wheat, and rice components, the IgE immunoblot and skin prick test with boiled rice proteins could be beneficial before diet recommendation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据