4.8 Article

Molecular-Resolution Interrogation of a Porphyrin Monolayer by Ultrahigh Vacuum Tip-Enhanced Raman and Fluorescence Spectroscopy

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 4114-4120

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01225

关键词

tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS); tip-enhanced fluorescence (TEF); ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy (UHV-STM); time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)

资金

  1. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences (SISGR) [DE-FG02-09ER16109]
  2. National Science Foundation Center for Chemical Innovation on Chemistry at the Space-Time Limit [CHE-1414466]
  3. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-1121262]
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1324585]
  5. Research Computing and Cyberinfrastructure, a unit of Information Technology Services at Penn State
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1414466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1414466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) and optically excited tip-enhanced fluorescence (TEF) of a self-assembled porphyrin monolayer on Ag(111) are studied using an ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscope (UHV-STM). Through selectively exciting different Q-bands of meso-tetrakis- (3,5-ditertiarybutylphenyl)-porphyrin (H2TBPP), chemical information regarding different vibronic excited states is revealed by a combination of theory and experiment; namely, TERS and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) simulations. The observed TEF spectra suggest a weak coupling of H2TBPP to the substrate due to the bulky t-butyl groups and a possible alternative excited state decay path. This work demonstrates the potential of combining TERS and TEF for studying surface-mounted porphyins on substrates, thus providing insight into porphyrin-sensitized solar cells and catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据