4.7 Article

Biobased Polymer Composites Derived from Corn Stover and Feather Meals as Double-Coating Materials for Controlled-Release and Water-Retention Urea Fertilizers

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 34, 页码 8166-8174

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf402519t

关键词

double-layer polymer-coated urea; corn stover; feather meal; nitrogen release rate; water retention; leaching

资金

  1. Science Tackle Key Problem of Shandong Province [2009GG10006002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2008.D29]
  3. Key Projects in the National Science AMP
  4. Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2011BAD11B01, 2011BAD11B02]
  5. Key Projects in the National 948 Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2011-G30]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871593]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we synthesized a biobased polyurethane using liquefied corn stover, isocyanate, and diethylenetriamine. The synthesized polyurethane was used as a coating material to control nitrogen (N) release from polymer-coated urea. A novel superabsorbent composite was also formulated from chicken feather protein (CFP), acrylic acid, and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide and used as an outer coating material for water retention. We studied the N release characteristics and water-retention capability of the double-layer polymer-coated urea (DPCU) applied in both water and soils. The ear yields, dry matter accumulation, total N use efficiency and N leaching from a sweet corn soil-plant system under two different irrigation regimes were also investigated. Comparison of DPCU treatments with conventional urea fertilizer revealed that DPCU treatments reduced the N release rate and improved water retention capability. Evaluation of soil and plant characteristics within the soil-plant system revealed that DPCU application effectively reduced N leaching loss, improved total N use efficiency, and increased soil water retention capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据