4.7 Article

Inhibitory Effects of Different Forms of Tocopherols, Tocopherol Phosphates, and Tocopherol Quinones on Growth of Colon Cancer Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 36, 页码 8533-8540

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf401076g

关键词

tocopherol; tocopheryl phosphate; tocopherol quinone; uptake; apoptosis

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1 CAI20915, RO1 CA122474, RO1 CA133021]
  2. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [CA72720]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Center [ES05022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tocopherols are the major source of dietary vitamin E. In this study, the growth inhibitory effects of different forms of tocopherols (T), tocopheryl phosphates (TP), and tocopherol quinones (TQ) on human colon cancer HCT116 and HT29 cells were investigated. (delta-T was more active than gamma-T in inhibiting colon cancer cell growth, decreasing cancer cell colony formation, and inducing apoptosis; however, alpha-T was rather ineffective. Similarly, the rate of cellular uptake also followed the ranking order delta-T > gamma-T >> alpha-T. TP and TQ generally had higher inhibitory activities than their parent compounds. Interestingly, the gamma forms of TP and TQwere more active than the (5 forms in inhibiting cancer cell growth, whereas the a forms were the least effective. The potencies of gamma-TQand delta-TQ (showing IC50 values of similar to 0.8 and similar to 2 mu M on HCT116 cells after a 72 h incubation, respectively) were greater than 100-fold and greater than 20-fold higher, respectively, than those of their parent tocopherols. Induction of cancer cell apopfosis by S-T, gamma-TP, and gamma-TQ was characterized by the cleavage of caspase 3 and PARP1 and DNA fragmentation. These studies demonstrated the higher growth inhibitory activity of delta-T than gamma-T, the even higher activities of the gamma forms of TP and TQ, and the ineffectiveness of the alpha forms of tocopherol and their metabolites against colon cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据