4.7 Article

Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis of Volatile Carbonyl Compounds in Virgin Olive Oils

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 50, 页码 12253-12259

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf404368m

关键词

volatile carbonyls; DNPH; UHPLC/DAD; GC/MS; lipid oxidation; virgin olive oil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enzymatic and chemical oxidation reaction in olive oil produces many volatile carbonyl compounds that contribute to the complex flavor of olive oil. A novel ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method with dynamic headspace sampling and 2;4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization were established to determine the volatile carbonyls in virgin olive oil. Quantification of nine characteristic carbonyls (acetone, hexanal, E-2-hexenal, octanal, E-2-octenal, nonanal, E-2-nonenal, E,E-2,4-nonadienal, and E,E-2,4-decadienal) was achieved using cyclopentanal as an internal standard. This method provides comparable linearity (R-2 = 0.9917-1.0000) and repeatability (less than 7.6% relative standard deviations) with solid phase microextraction gas chromatography (SPME-GC). The relative standard deviations (%RSD) of all applied carbonyl standards were lower than 7.6%. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were in the ranges of 1.6-150.1 and 4.8-906.1 mu g/kg. The recoveries obtained for olive oil samples were in the range of 81.0-115.3%. To show the potential of this method on the quantification of other volatile carbonyls that were not included in this study, GC-electron ionization mass spectrometry (GC-EI/MS) was employed to identify the derivatized carbonyls (carbonyl (2,4-DNPH) hydrazones) while peak assignments were made on the basis of elution sequences and peak areas. This method provided feasibility of using LC to determine volatile carbonyls in oil matrices, which can be applied to exam the degree of lipid oxidation and evaluate the sensory properties of VOO and other edible oils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据