4.7 Article

Development of an Improved Method for Trace Analysis of Quinolones in Eggs of Laying Hens and Wildlife Species Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 44, 页码 11005-11014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf303222a

关键词

Fluoroquinolones; LC-MS/MS; triple quadrupole; molecularly imprinted polymers; solvent extraction; solid-phase extraction; eggs; wildlife eggs

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (SCARCE) [CSD-665-2009]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2011-29703-C02-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive, selective, and efficient method was developed for simultaneous determination of 11 fluoroquinolones (FQs), ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, flumequine, marbofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid, and sarafloxacin, in eggs by molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and column liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS). Samples were diluted with 50 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate at pH 7.4, followed by purification with a commercial MIP (SupelMIP SPE-Fluoroquinolones). Recoveries for the 11 quinolones were in the range of 90-106% with intra- and interday relative standard deviation ranging from 1 to 6% and from 3 to 8%, respectively. Limits of detection (LODs) were 0.12-0.85 ng/g, and limits of quantification (LOQs) were 036 and 239 ng/g, whereas the decision limit (CC alpha) and detection capability (CC beta) ranged from 0.46 to 3.35 ng/g and from 0.59 to 4.12 ng/g, respectively The calculated relevant validation parameters are in an acceptable range and in compliance with the requirements of Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. Moreover, a comparison to two other sample treatments [solid phase extraction (SPE) and solvent extraction] has been carried out The method was applied to lying hens, Japanese quail, and black headed gull eggs, in which FQs were not found. The method was also applied to study the depletion of sarafloxacin in eggs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据