4.7 Article

Effects of Curcumin Concentration and Temperature on the Spectroscopic Properties of Liposomal Curcumin

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 1865-1870

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf204867v

关键词

curcumin; liposome; absorption; fluorescence; anisotropy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173081]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [11ZR1408600]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK0914037]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spectroscopic properties of liposomal curcumin in pH 7.0 sodium phosphate buffer were studied at various curcumin concentrations and temperatures. At 25 degrees C, liposomal curcumin exhibited much higher values than free curcumin in absorption maximum, fluorescence maximum, and fluorescence anisotropy. When curcumin concentration was increased from 2 to 20 mu M, the values of fluorescence anisotropy of liposomal curcumin decreased gradually, consistent with the reduction of phase transition temperature of liposome. This observation revealed that liposomal curcumin can disrupt the packing of phospholipid bilayer and give a loose and disordered structure. On the other hand, as the temperature was increased from 25 to 80 degrees C, the relative intensity of maximum absorption of liposomal curcumin showed a more pronounced decrease above the phase transition temperature than lower temperatures, suggesting a weaker curcumin protection from the liquid crystalline phase of phospholipid bilayer than the rigid gel phase. However, it was observed that the fluorescence anisotropy of liposomal curcumin had higher values as the temperature increased. This phenomenon was explained as the result of location change of curcumin toward the core of phospholipid bilayer, although the structure of the phospholipid bilayer tended to be looser at higher temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据