4.7 Article

Effects on 3-Mercaptohexan-1-ol Precursor Concentrations from Prolonged Storage of Sauvignon Blanc Grapes Prior to Crushing and Pressing

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 13, 页码 3515-3523

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf300054h

关键词

wine aroma; 3-mercaptohexan-1-ol; wine thiol precursors; storage; C6 volatiles; grape reaction product; analysis; synthesis

资金

  1. Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation
  2. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formation of wine thiol precursors is a dynamic process, which can be influenced by vineyard and winery processing operations. With the aim of increasing thiol precursor concentrations, a study of the effects of storing machine-harvested Sauvignon blanc grapes prior to crushing and pressing was undertaken on a commercial scale. 3-Mercaptohexan-1-ol (3-MH) precursors, 2-S-glutathionylcaftaric acid (grape reaction product, GRP), glutathione (GSH) and a number of C6 compounds were assessed at several time points during the experiment. The concentration of the cysteine precursor to 3-MH doubled within 8 h and tripled after 30 h while the GSH and cysteinylglycine precursors increased in concentration roughly 1.5 times. (E)-2-Hexenal and GSH levels decreased as thiol precursors, GRP and C6 alcohols increased during storage. Principal component analysis revealed that precursors contributed to most of the variation within the samples over the storage period, with additional influence, primarily from GSH and GRP, as well as (E)-2-hexenal and (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol. Early storage time points were associated with higher concentrations of GSH and some unsaturated C6 compounds while longer storage times were most closely associated with higher thiol precursor and GRP concentrations. This study provides a detailed overview of interactions related to thiol precursor formation on a commercial scale and highlights the ability to manipulate precursor concentrations prior to grape crushing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据