4.7 Article

Proteomic Analysis of Temperature-Dependent Changes in Stored UHT Milk

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 1837-1846

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf104395v

关键词

two-dimensional electrophoresis; cross-linking; deamidation; lactosylation; casein; whey; MALDI-TOF MS

资金

  1. Dairy Australia [UQ11128]
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Dairy Innovation Australia Ltd. [LP0884051]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0884051] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular changes in milk proteins during storage of UHT-treated milk have been investigated using two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) coupled to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. UHT-treated samples were stored at three cliFferent temperatures, 4 degrees C, 28 degrees C, and 40 degrees C, for two months. Three main changes could be observed on 2-DE gels following storage. They were (1) the appearance of diffuse staining regions above the position of the monomeric caseins caused by nondisulfide cross-linking of alpha and beta-caseins; (2) the appearance of additional acidic forms of proteins, predominantly of alpha(s1)-casein, caused by deamidation; and (3) the appearance of stacked spots caused by lactosylation of whey proteins. The extent of the changes increased with increased storage temperature. Mass spectrometric analysis of in-gel tryptic digests showed that the crosslinked proteins were dominated by alpha(S1)-casein, but a heterogeneous population of cross-linked forms with alpha(S2)-casein and beta-casein was also observed. Tandem MS analysis was used to confirm deamidation of N(129) in alpha(S1)-casein. MS analysis of the stacked spots reyealed lactosylation of 9/15 lysines in beta-lactoglobulin and 8/12 lysines in alpha-lactalbumin. More extensive analysis will be required to confirm the nature of the cross-links and additional deamidation sites in alpha(S1)-casein as the highly phosphorylated nature of the caseins makes them challenging prospects for MS analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据