4.7 Article

Anti-inflammatory Activity of New Compounds from Andrographis paniculata by NF-κB Transactivation Inhibition

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 2505-2512

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf903629j

关键词

Andrographis paniculata; NF-kappa B; pro-inflammatory mediator; 19-O-acetyl-14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide; macrophage inflammatory protein-2

资金

  1. Committee on Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy of Department of Health, Republic of China [CCMP95-RD-105]
  2. China Medical University [CMU98-CT-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies showed that the ethyl acetate (EtOAc) fraction of Andrographis paniculata (AP) possessed anti-inflammatory activity. This study further isolated these active compounds from bioactivity-guided chromatographic fractionation and identified eight pure compounds. Reporter gene assay indicated that 5-hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavone (1), 5-hydroxy-7,8-dimethoxyflavanone (2), a mix of beta-sitosterol (3a) and stigmasterol (3b), ergosterol peroxide (4), 14-deoxy-14,15-dehydroandrographolide (5), and a new compound, 19-O-acetyl-14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (6a), significantly inhibited the transcriptional activity of NF-kappa B in LPS/IFN-gamma stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages (P < 0.05). The two most abundant compounds, 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (7) and andrographolide (8), had less inhibitory activity but exerted greater inhibitory activity by hydrogenation, oxidation, or acetylation to become four derived compounds, 9, 10, 11, and 12. All of the compounds significantly decreased TNF-alpha, IL-6, macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), and nitric oxide (NO) secretions from LPS/IFN-gamma stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Compounds 5, 11, and 12 exerted the strongest inhibitory effect on NF-kappa B-dependent transactivation in the RAW 264.7 cell, with IC50 values of 2, 2.2, and 2.4 mu g/mL, respectively, providing encouraging results for bioactive compound development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据