4.7 Article

A Citrus Extract Containing Flavanones Represses Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) Expression and Regulates Multiple Inflammatory, Tissue Repair, and Fibrosis Genes in Human Colon Fibroblasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 19, 页码 9305-9315

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf901983g

关键词

In vitro digestion; Intestinal stability; microarrays; MMP-12; migration; monocytes adhesion

资金

  1. ZosterS.A. (Murcia, Spain)
  2. Fundacion Seneca, Murcia, Spain [05556/Pi/04]
  3. Fun-C-Food [CSD2007-00063]
  4. CSIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The consumption of flavonoid-rich Citrus extracts has been associated with multiple beneficial effects including anti-inflammatory properties, but the potential effects on the inflammatory responses in the gut have not been thoroughly investigated. We used microarrays to search for molecular changes induced in human colon fibroblasts in response to the exposure to a flavanone-rich bitter orange extract under physiologically representative conditions. Dietary nontoxic levels of the predigested extract induced moderate but significant changes in the expression of genes associated with tissue repair and inflammation. Among the top regulated genes, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) was downregulated, and the matrix metallopeptidase 12 (MMP-12) was upregulated (mRNA and protein levels). Both proteins are involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and fibroblast migration. The extract also affected the fibroblast migration and reduced monocyte adhesion, but the response was different in unstimulated cells and in cells pretreated with TNF-alpha Collectively, these results were indicative of a moderate activation of the colon fibroblast inflammation-related function after exposure to the extract. Further investigations are required to identify the in vivo role of this Citrus derived extract in the maintenance of the normal balance in the intestine and in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据