4.7 Article

Quantitation of S-Methylmethionine in Raw Vegetables and Green Malt by a Stable Isotope Dilution Assay Using LC-MS/MS: Comparison with Dimethyl Sulfide Formation after Heat Treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 19, 页码 9091-9096

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf901765q

关键词

S-Methylmethionine; dimethyl sulfide; stable isotope dilution assay; tomato; asparagus; celery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potent odorant dimethyl sulfide (1), showing a low odor threshold of 0.1 2 mu g/L in water, is known to contribute to the aromas of various foods. Its cabbage-like odor plays an important role, particularly, in cooked vegetables, such as cabbage, celery, or asparagus. On the other hand, in fruit juices or beer, 1 may generate off-flavors. S-Methylmethionine (2) has previously been characterized as precursor of 1 during thermal processing, and several methods for its quantitation have been proposed. Using deuterium-labeled 2 as the internal standard, a stable isotope dilution assay (SIDA) using LC-MS/MS was developed for the fast quantitation of 2 in vegetables and malt. Application of the method to different foods revealed amounts between 2.8 mg (fresh tomatoes) and 176 mg (celery) of 2 per kilogram. To correlate the amount of 1 formed upon processing with the amounts of 2 present in the raw material, 1 was quantified before and after a thermal treatment of the same raw materials by a SIDA. Concentrations between 1.1 mg/kg (fresh tomatoes) and 26 mg/kg (celery) were determined in the processed samples. The quantitation of 2 during steeping, germination, and malting of barley, and a correlation of the data with the amounts of 1 formed after thermal treatment of the malt, resulted in yields between 24 and 27 mol % calculated on the basis of the amounts of 2. The results suggested that the extent of the formation of 1 can be predicted, for example, in plant materials, from the amount of 2 present in the raw foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据