4.7 Article

Antifirming Effects of Starch Degrading Enzymes in Bread Crumb

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 2346-2355

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf803058v

关键词

Amylase; starch structure; bread staling; amylopectin recrystallization

资金

  1. Research Fund K.U.Leuven [GOA/03/10]
  2. Flanders' FOOD, the centre of innovation for the Flemish food industry, Brussels, Belgium
  3. European Commission within the Communities' sixth framework program, Project Healthgrain [FP6-514008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antifirming properties of amylases in bread crumb were evaluated in straight dough breadmaking and related to the amylolytically modified starch structure. Amylase properties and action mechanisms determine starch structure in the breads and, hence, how amylopectin recrystallization, starch network formation, water redistribution, and water mobility occur during breadmaking and storage. A bacterial endo-alpha-amylase mainly hydrolyzed the longer starch polymer chains internally. It thus reduced the number of connections between the crystallites in the starch networks, resulting in a softer bread crumb. However, because the enzyme had only little impact on the outer amylopectin chains, amylopectin recrystallization and the concomitant water immobilization presumably were not hindered. The loss of plasticizing water as a result of recrystallization presumably reduces the flexibility of the gluten network and results in poor crumb resilience. In contrast, in breadmaking, the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic alpha-amylase acted as an exoacting amylase with more pronounced endoaction at higher temperatures. This enzyme caused extensive degradation of the crystallizable amylopectin side chains and thus limited amylopectin recrystallization and network formation during storage. As a result, it prevented the incorporation of water in the amylopectin crystallites. In this way, the different starch and gluten networks kept their flexibility, resulting in a softer crumb with good resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据