4.7 Article

Vitamin D2 formation from post-harvest UV-B treatment of mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) and retention during storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 4541-4544

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0732511

关键词

ultraviolet; Agaricus bisporus; mushrooms; vitamin D; intensity; dosage; degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives of this research were to study the effects of high intensity (0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 mW/cm(2)), dose (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 J/cm(2)), and postharvest time (1 and 4 days) on the vitamin D-2 formation in Portabella mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) as a result of UV-B exposure, as well as the vitamin D-2 degradation in treated mushrooms during storage. Within each intensity application, dose had the largest effect where more exposure converted more vitamin D-2 from ergosterol. Similar dose across each intensity application resulted in similar vitamin D-2 concentration. Practical commercial production requires as short a treatment time as possible, and intensity was a major factor from this standpoint where the time it took to achieve a similar vitamin D-2 concentration for similar dose exposure was significantly reduced as intensity increased. By using an intensity of 1.0 mW/cm(2) at a dose of 0.5 J/cm(2), the concentration of vitamin D-2 produced was 3.83 mu g/g dry solids of mushrooms in 8 min, whereas using an intensity of 0.5 mW/cm(2) at a dose of 0.5 J/cm(2), the concentration of vitamin D-2 produced was 3.75 mu g/g dry solids of mushrooms in 18 min. Also, postharvest time did not have a significant effect on vitamin D-2 formation in mushrooms that were treated 1 and 4 days after harvest. Vitamin D-2 degraded in treated mushrooms during storage by apparent first-order kinetics, where the degradation rate constant was 0.025 h(-1). The information provided in this study will help mushroom producers develop commercial-scale UV treatment processes to add value to their crop while improving consumer health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据