4.7 Article

Acute and chronic effects of honey and its carbohydrate constituents on calcium absorption in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 2649-2654

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf073357w

关键词

honey; nondigestible carbohydrates; calcium absorption; Ca-45; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of honey and its carbohydrate constituents (glucose, fructose, and raffinose) on calcium absorption in rats were investigated in acute and chronic feeding studies. In the acute study, rats (n = 120) were gavaged with an oral solution consisting of (a) 10 mu Ci Ca-45, (b) 25 mg of calcium as calcium acetate, and (c) one of the following: 0 mg of honey (control), or 200, 500, or 800 mg of honey, a glucose-fructose mixture, 10.75 mg of raffinose, or 200 mg of raffinose. Another group received Ca-45 intraperitoneally. Femurs were collected 2 days later and analyzed for Ca-45 content. Rats given 500 and 800 mg of honey showed 25.5 and 33.6% increases in calcium absorption (P < 0.05), respectively, over the control group. Groups given the glucose-fructose mixture or 200 mg of raffinose had a significantly higher increase in calcium absorption than the control group (17.1 and 25.6%, respectively). In the chronic study, rats (n = 96) were fed for 8 weeks with either 0% honey (control), 5% honey, 10% honey, or a glucose-fructose-raffinose (GFR) mixture. Femurs of GFR-fed rats had significantly lower calcium content, 45Ca absorption, width, and BMD (at distal region) than control rats. Groups fed honey did not show the negative effects of GFR on bone, but had no advantage over the control group. No significant differences were observed in femur length, density, strength, or BMC among any treatment group compared to the control group. These results indicate that although a positive dose-response effect of honey and its carbohydrate constituents on calcium absorption was observed in the acute study, this effect disappeared upon long-term feeding in rats, implying adaptation had occurred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据