4.1 Article

Determinants of Neighborhood Activity of Adults Age 70 and Over: A Mixed-Methods Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 148-170

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/japa.20.2.148

关键词

barriers; facilitators; qualitative

资金

  1. National Prevention Research Initiative [G0501312]
  2. British Heart Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Department of Health
  5. Diabetes UK
  6. Economic and Social Research Council
  7. Medical Research Council
  8. Research and Development Office for the Northern Ireland Health and Social Services
  9. Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Executive Health Department
  10. Welsh Assembly Government
  11. World Cancer Research Fund
  12. MRC [MR/K00414X/1, G0501312] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Medical Research Council [MR/K00414X/1, G0501312] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This mixed-methods study investigated personal, interpersonal, and environmental factors salient to decisions about being active in neighborhoods of different levels of deprivation. Methods: Twenty-five participants age 70 years and older (10 women) with diverse physical activity levels provided data on their weekly activity patterns (using accelerometry) and their perceived barriers to exercise (questionnaire). They also participated in semistructured individual interviews exploring the barriers and facilitators influencing neighborhood activity. Results: Functional limitations, lack of intrinsic motivation, and not having an activity companion were the highest impact barriers. Walkable access to amenities, positive physical activity perceptions, and existing habit of being active were the highest impact facilitators. Conclusions: The perceived quality and accessibility of the built and natural environments influence neighborhood activity in older adults. However, this relationship might be altered through the influence of personal and interpersonal determinants such as maintenance of good health and functional ability and supportive social networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据