4.7 Article

Social support barriers and mental health in terrorist attack survivors

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 187-193

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.014

关键词

Social support barriers; Social support; Terrorism; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Adolescent

资金

  1. Norwegian Directorate of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To expand our understanding of social support and mental health, we introduce a measure of social support barriers and investigate the relationship between these barriers, social support, mental health and gender in survivors of the terrorist attack on Utoya Island, Norway. Methods: Survivors (N=285) were interviewed face to face. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the latent factor structure of the Social Support Barriers Scale and perceived social support (FSSQ), and linear regression analyses to investigate the associations between social support variables and mental health (PTSD-RI and HSCL-8). Results: The CFA indicated that social support barriers and perceived social support were two separable latent constructs. Social support barriers were highly associated with posttraumatic stress reactions (adjusted regression coefficient=0.38, 95% CI=0.29-047. p <0001) as well as with psychological distress (adjusted regression coefficient=0.35, 95% CI=0.26-0.43, p <0.001). In contrast, neither perceived social support nor gender was associated with mental health after adjustment for barriers. Limitations: Most analyses were based on cross-sectional data. This is the first study to use a quantitative measure of social support barriers. Conclusion: Social support barriers may be a new opening to understand the relationship between social support and mental health and may have a role in explaining why women are at increased risk for mental health problems. Clinicians should explore not only perceived social support but also barriers to making use of these resources when consulting young people facing major life adversities. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据